On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 00:18 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Are there any changes to the build instructions between BDB 4.3.x and > 4.4.x?
I believe the 4.3 instructions used a couple of flags being passed to fix and issue with building the shared libraries, and 4.4 does not need them. I don't really remember though. > If not, we can possibly put in a note that the user regress to > 4.3.x if they *really* want subversion and BDB. It is unreasonable for us to expect a user to determine before-hand if he needs BDB capability. SVN is used to fetch sources from anywhere, and you don't necessarily know what type of setup is at some remote locations. I don't know, but it may be that with the bum DB issue, there may be problems fetching sources that are stored in a BDB SVN back-end. > I don't know if that breaks other packages though. Exactly. How do we know that changing the versions of DB, especially going backward, won't break things like already existing man db's created by Man_DB, or other packages that use (or already have created) a BDB back end. > Do we have any clues about when svn 1.3.1 will be released? No, I don't. -- Randy rmlinux: [bogomips 3993.32] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.2] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 10:45:33 up 13 days, 17:20, 5 users, load average: 0.05, 0.01, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
