Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Not quite true anymore; 2.6.16 also includes some new syscalls (openat > and friends) that will (may? probably "will") require changes in the > userspace headers.
Most definitely, if you want them to be used that is :-) Tho' only Glibc-2.4 and above has support for the new syscalls so it shouldn't matter much to LFS from a release POV. > Now, yes, we could patch these into llh (actually, Mariusz may welcome > us doing a patch like that, if we give it to him as well; it might be > worth a shot at least). More info about Mariusz here: http://www.diy-linux.org/pipermail/diy-linux-dev/2006-March/000755.html Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
