On 3/8/06, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think deps. that are needed for testsuites could be labeled as being > "optional" (notice I already started doing that for a few packages) but > you could do the same with several others. For example...
I saw that and started making those same changes in my sandbox. However, this could become pretty ugly. Perhaps if there was a separate Optional Dependencies heading. Or Testing Dependencies. Or, since LFS doesn't include that many packages, we could make a single page with a table that lists all the deps. I think this was already suggested before. Just for the case of automake and it's ridiculous test suite dependency list, some sort of policy needs to be decided on. For now, let's continue putting in the deps as they've been found. We can always change the appearance later. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
