> I assume neither the presence of /../../../ nor the additional
> compilers is really a problem, I've just never noticed them before. The
> /../../../ certainly isn't necessary and I wouldn't think the multiple
> copies are either. When I stumbled upon this in the final ch6 sanity
> check, I figured I made a typeo and started over, but I got the same
> result again.
>
> All the other toolchain package tests pass as expected.
>
> Any idea what I might have done wrong to get this?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy.
Getting the same thing here on my scripted builds... the ch.6 sanity checks
pass, but after building ch.6 gcc and then redoing the tests, the
grep "/usr/lib/crt.* " dummy.log
test doesn't find anything.
Packages from there on build fine (until man-db, which is failing now, but
might be unrelated).
Jeremy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
