On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 18:43 -0700, Archaic wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 07:26:15PM -0500, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > > > Comments? > > My comment is let's just build it right instead of relying on a make > target that builds gcc 3 times. If the wrong includes and libs are being > used, why can't we just make it look in the right places? In fact, I > thought that's what we were doing. >
Excactly how many hacks and workarounds do you want to incorporate into the lfs build to accomodate the one pass final native gcc build? Thats the choice - Multiple hacks to try to get the gcc build to behave for single pass - Use the bootstrap target and forget about maintaining said hacks make bootstrap will always do the right thing. Best Regards [R] -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
