Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > >The ACUTE ACCENT part looks wrong. > > But libiconv also transliterates it to "'" :)
The correctness criteria for glibc are stronger than for libiconv, since it's used by many more people. It can also be a bug in libiconv, due to the fact that at the time when I introduced that transliteration, I was still using the old X11 fonts which showed <U0027> as a curled apostrophe, similar to a prime. Bruno -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
