Peter Ennis wrote these words on 01/24/06 00:23 CST: > This may well be the case, but many people will > view the site using this particular non-standard, > whether or not they are a target audience. > If it looks bad and is easy to fix but remains > unfixed due to lack of "catering" then it does > not do the project justice.
I wasn't going to comment on this as I respect Bruce's judgment too much (though I disagreed in a big way here). However, since I'm about the fourth person to comment that *we* think that this just isn't right and needs to be fixed, I don't feel so bad. I can't see saying that IE users need to have a shitty take on our stuff and tough luck to them if they don't like it. Surely, it can be fixed so that IE can render properly. I've never met an instance where I couldn't pacify IE, though I loath its quirks. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 00:31:00 up 121 days, 9:55, 3 users, load average: 0.36, 0.35, 0.56 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
