Jeremy Herbison wrote:
Okay, but in the event that it finds a problem, you'll still need a recovery disk of some sort. Or, if it can't run fsck at all because fsck is linked to a damaged .so, you'll know there is a problem anyhow and you'll STILL need a recovery disk with a different fsck binary :)
Which is why I said it's better to use a static binary. :) -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
