Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 12/28/05 18:28 CST: > The subject says it all:) I would like to propose mentioning optional > dependencies for packages that are installed in LFS. Since most of the > packages are never mentioned in BLFS, the dependencies never get > mentioned.
Good idea. There is precedent as well. Just recently, the CrackLib package was listed as something optional to install before the Shadow package to provide extended capability for Shadow. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 18:29:00 up 95 days, 3:53, 3 users, load average: 0.14, 0.34, 0.51 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
