Dan Nicholson wrote: > then I won't say another word. Anyway, I applaud your effort on this > even though I'm not behind it right now.
Well, I assume you mean not behind it as things stand right at this time? Is that correct? Or do you mean that the idea is a futile one? I'm interested in seeing your work, and I'll be looking at doing some of my own. I've taken your point about the chapter 6 purity analysis and will concede. I'll also agree that we're not ready for the change yet - as this thread has shown there's too much testing to do - but I still think that we need to go this direction, which could ultimately help point out bugs in the entire LFS build process. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
