Hi guys, I think the most elegant way for a fake root is really the unionfs way. You don't need to change any line in LFS doc, only a few words and requirements at the beginning. This should be discussed.
regards - Bernd -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Kev Buckley Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2005 11:57 An: lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Betreff: Re: More control...hint integration discussion > > > > > > Ah, yes. The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything LFS. > > I personally think it's more than just building a minimal working > > system, and I think there are others that will agree with me there. That > > should be shown by the fact that there are and continue to be such > > packages as perl, auto{make, conf}, vim and readline in the base LFS > > book. (This wasn't meant to start a discussion about whether or not > > those packages should be there - we've done that already.) > > > > -- > > JH > > The answer is 42 > > Matt > Surely 57 - that being the number of package users created when installing the current SVN of LFS (though I'm including LFS_Bootscripts and the kernel as "packages" there ) Then again, maybe it is 56: because you don't really need to install Berkeley DB (so to get arpd from IPRoute2) at the LFS stage of system building ? -- Regards, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Kevin M. Buckley e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * Systems Administrator * * Computer Centre * * Lancaster University Voice: +44 (0) 1524 5 93718 * * LANCASTER. LA1 4YW Fax : +44 (0) 1524 5 25113 * * England. * * * * My PC runs Linux/GNU, you still computing the Bill Gate$' way ? * ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
