On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:53:11AM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > On the second thought, I tend to agree that there is no need to use > config.site in regular LFS, IF a permission is granted to deviate and > use config.site instead of the official LFS instructions for the purpose > of building the official LFS LiveCD.
Sometimes I think you overstress the need for absolute duplication between the book and the livecd makefiles. If the instructions are the same, what does it matter if you use config.site and the book doesn't? As long as changes to the book are accurately tracked, I see no problem with the makefiles using config.site. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
