Matthew Burgess wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Matthew Burgess wrote: >> >>> 4) Do something with the udev configuration vs. /etc/group conflict >>> reported in bug 1639. >> >> >> How about the udev version ? Should we stick with 056 or upgrade it >> to 070 ? (I seem to remember that something newer than 056 was needed >> for newer kernels at some point, but maybe that was only a problem >> when booting.) > > > Well, if we upgrade udev, will that act as a precedent to upgrade all > the other packages too? Or is there a particular bug in 056 that you > want to see fixed in 6.1.1? I can't remember the exact combinations of > kernel and udev that play well together/break each other, but I have a > feeling if we upgrade either, we'd need to upgrade the other too.
My understanding was that 6.1.1 was a bug fix release. I am in favor of only updating the minimum number of packages necessary to fix the bugs. In my mind, *only* those packages listed in the errata should be upgraded: texinfo, perl, util-linux, bzip2, vim, and zlib. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
