On 10/6/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do the similar warnings for binutils and gcc need removing too, or is it > just glibc that is pretty agnostic with regards to optimisation options?
Just finished all 3. Here was my experience. Hardware is PIII with 512 MB RAM, Intel i810 chipset. glibc: passed tests with -O3 -march=i686 -pipe, didn't like -march=pentium3. gcc: this was the pickiest. Passed all tests (except va-arg25) with -O2 -march=i386 -pipe. I don't even know if i386 causes any optimization. It did not like -march=i686. Didn't try any other -O setting. binutils: passed test with -O2 -march=pentium3 -pipe. Seems to be the most resilient to optimization settings for me. Again, didn't try any other -O settings. Would like to try again with -O3 to see what happens. Hope that helps some. Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
