On 9/18/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Archaic wrote: > > True enough, but snapshots suck. Before doing that, I would vote for > > taking gcc-4 out of trunk so we can continue with gcc-3.4.x and > > Why? Glibc snapshots especially are known to be working and stable(-ish ;) ) >
I am with Archaic. If the stable releases of some packages (especially something as critical as glibc) are not gcc4 ready, perhaps we have been hasty in upgrading to gcc4? For example, qt4 has been out for quite sometime now. Should we upgrade the blfs book to qt4 + KDE snapshots or should we stick with a stable combination of qt3 + KDE3? Of course it is the second option :) -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
