On 9/17/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The patch header just says "pending" - does that mean it's pending a > response from upstream, or it's pending submission upstream? Anyway, > looking at the comments in the patch, leads me to suggest it'll be > rejected straight away due to the author's self-admitted hackish > approach (lines 40-46 of the patch). Maybe someone could take a look at > the patch and update it with regard to any improved/changed interfaces > in the kernel and/or toolchain that are now available to us? >
Probably never submitted upstream owing to the hack. IMO, if someone is subscribed to the coreutils mailing-list, they can atleast submit the patch in response to the thread with the hope that more experienced folks on their mailing-lists can take the existing patch and morph it into something non-hackish. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
