Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 09/13/05 13:50 CST: > Archaic and I have put our heads together to try and come up with a more > reasonable set of Udev rules. These are based on the following criteria:
Looking over the new rules proposal further, I would like to go on record as being against the proposal. It is simply a whole bunch of work for the BLFS team, but that isn't the reason I'm against the idea. I don't see the payoff in the scheme. I suppose I still look at it that whatever hardware may be installed on the machine should have a device node (if appropriate) created for it at boot time, regardless if there is software that can actually use it. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 14:05:01 up 164 days, 13:38, 3 users, load average: 1.08, 0.78, 0.43 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
