Hi All, I wanted to open this up to the entire community for further comments (especially for those that may not watch the alfs-discuss list). A question was brought up on alfs-discuss today that I thought deserves some attention.
As far as I am aware, historically, ALFS as a project was conceived to provide access to various implementations of automating the building of LFS (and possibly extending to BLFS). Of course, now we have one official implementation and a new official build tool conceptualized. But should that be the extent of it? Or should ALFS endeavor to host various build methods/implementations? If you want to read the thread that sparked this question (only 2 posts so far): http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/alfs-discuss/2005-August/006908.html I am anxious to hear the entire LFS community's thoughts, so please, if you have an opinion about this, speak up. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
