On 8/4/05, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IMHO it looks like a problem in Glibc ie: ldconfig, albeit a minor one. > These 2 threads are relevant (I think): > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-07/msg00098.html > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-08/msg00120.html
Based on the second thread the current behavior is indeed a bug and should be fixed in glibc. > > Why do we install the symlink anyway? ncurses installs libcurses.so. We need to recreate the symlink coz we move the *.so.* files to /lib and this results in a danling /usr/lib/libcurses.so symlink. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
