On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:36:46PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > You are entitled to your opinion, thanks for offering it. Though I > cannot see why you think that by installing *one* simple library, and > the accompanying dictionary, is something that we would not want to > suggest in the default LFS build, seeing how it plugs such a big > security gap in the current LFS build.
This is not a security gap in LFS any more than the lack of a firewall which, just like cracklib, *may* or *may not* be needed for a person's personal situation. Regardless, it is completely unneeded for a base development system. I vote for a link to BLFS only. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
