Archaic wrote these words on 08/04/05 23:32 CST: > Here is an argument, then: it isn't needed for a base development system > as proven by 6 years of its absence. There is no valid technical reason > to include it or exclude it. It's merely a choice.
This can be said for many of the LFS packages. Please provide an opinion on whether it should be added to the default LFS build. Mind you, as I've said before, I don't care either way. I just wish folks would give a yes or no answer. :-) -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 23:37:01 up 124 days, 23:10, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.17, 0.26 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
