Gerard Beekmans wrote these words on 07/26/05 16:57 CST: > For all intents and purposes it might as well be running on Jim's > private machines while it is being developed and turned into something > usable that can be integrated with the LFS Book. > > When Cross-LFS gets to a point it becomes an official "LFS > product" (for lack of a better description right now), then things will > obviously change and no changes are to be made without discussion.
I suppose you and I will just have to disagree with the philosophy of this method of operation. Understand it is okay to disagree, disagreement fosters discussion, and providing the discussion stays civil, can only be a good thing. However, if there is a chance that the Cross-LFS stuff can/will/should/might be/whatever the official "LFS product", then folks should be able to discuss things and recommend/suggest changes, starting now. The way you say things, it is up to Jim to do whatever he feels like, then later, the group can decide to implement what Jim did. I would like to think that if Cross-LFS has a chance at becoming the default build method, the group should be involved with the project from the beginning.At least that's how I see it. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 17:03:01 up 115 days, 16:36, 2 users, load average: 0.95, 0.46, 0.21 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
