On Monday 25 July 2005 18:14, Ken Moffat wrote: [...] > Personally, I bleed on 2.6.12 (my athlon64's ability to power off > seems to have been broken by the acpi changes). But, most of the > important bug fixes in 2.6.12 should be in 2.6.11.12, no ? I am running 2.6.12 in a couple of PCs with no ACPI problem. I read that in one of the latests changelogs that there were patches to fix the ACPI so I believe you.
The real question is how many patches or how big a patch do you want to apply before moving to the next release. It's just a suggestion based on my personal experience. [...] > Almost all webservers run apache, so it needs to be a core part of > the distribution. But that's why we have blfs - I don't intend to > dictate what you run on your boxes, please don't attempt to > overload my build with things that I can't run. I'm not trying to overload any build, I'm just suggesting. I'm not going to die if it's not included anywhere. Cheers, SeattleGaucho -- Blog: http://seattlegaucho.blogspot.com "No! Try not. Do, or do not. There is no spoon." ...Yoda to Neo -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
