On 6/27/05, David Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Burgess wrote: > > > I'd be prone to just leave it alone for now, seeing as it hasn't > > caused us any real problems so far. > > > Here is what I did on a new LFS-BOOK-SVN-20050625: > 6.13.Binutils-2.16 > after 'make tooldir=/usr install' > sed -i "s:^\(dep.*=\).*:\1' -liberty':" /usr/lib/libbfd.la > > 6.14. GCC-3.4.4 > after 'make install' > sed -i "s:^\(dep.*=\).*:\1' -lm -lc -lgcc_s':" \ > /usr/lib/libstdc++.la /usr/lib/libsupc++.la > > All .la's are now nice and clean and I find no problems, I'm happy. > > To me this seems a short-coming of the supplied ltmain.sh's. However I > have not been successful hacking them.
Does anyone know why these libtool files are useful? I have been deleting all the .la files without any problems. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
