Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Jim Gifford wrote: > >> Matt, Jeremy, and LFS-Dev, >> >> What are you feelings on cross-lfs moving to GCC 4.x? >> >> Or do you want to continue the testing with 3.4.4, then after >> that's completly stablized, then move to >> GCC 4.x? >> >> I've looked at what Ryan has done, not to many things to change. > > > As tempting as that sounds, cross-lfs is complicated enough as it is. > I'd suggest getting gcc4 into trunk and once we've got it building > smoothly, *then* update cross-lfs. > > -- > JH
I built a GCC-4 based system. There are patches required, yes, but not too many, even for BLFS. They are easy to find, as Red Hat has done a lot of the work for FC4. My advice is to get Cross-LFS into testing ASAP, Make an experimental release with 3.x.x very quickly after 6.1 - this lets the world start getting the real bugs out (the ones we can't see because twe are too close). And then put Gcc-4 into it. (This presumes that Cross-LFS will become the next LFS release after 6.1) I don't think we have the manpower to maintain two mainstream LFS books. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
