Matthew Burgess wrote: > Bryan Kadzban wrote: > >> Matthew Burgess wrote: >> >>> I suppose the 20 line scan.l hunk in it is redundant, though it's >>> not going to save that much space in the grand scheme of things. >> >> It won't save space, but removing that file from the patch will >> prevent scan.c from being rebuilt. Which was (part of) the whole >> point. > > Well, I shuffled the scan.l and scan.c parts around so that scan.c > wouldn't be rebuilt (`patch' should touch scan.c last, thereby > fooling `make' into thinking that scan.c is up to date).
Ah, I didn't catch that. OK, then it is merely redundant.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
