Marty _ wrote: > Why doesnt someone do something sensible and mount devfs to /.devfs
Uh... because we don't use devfs? ;-) > Bring back the old devices style. udev does (almost completely, anyway), with the rules file(s) we use. One difference is that you won't see devices for drivers you don't load. > But seriously, why dont we just mount the device somewhere else and > just symlink them across when needed? What's the difference between a directory full of device nodes and a directory full of symlinks?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
