On 5/20/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Crosby wrote: > > > Just drop the "[" construct altogether and use /bin/test exclusively? > > Well, I'd much prefer just punting on this. Let's just assume that if a > shell implements 'test' then it does so in a standards conformant > manner. If it doesn't then the affected user reports it as a bug > upstream. Our scripts *do* conform to the standard, and I personally > think that's the best we can do. > > Regards, > > Matt.
I think aiming for ash and bash compliancy is probably as far as we want to go... The bootscripts are complicated enough as it is. As for replacing == with = or -eq, it sounds like a simple enough change. Doesnt appear to be any reason to prefer == to the other options. -- Nathan Coulson (conathan) ------ nathan at linuxfromscratch org conathan at gmail com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
