Matthew Burgess wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I suppose though we'll need 2 host compilers, we'll need a 3.4 for >> the kernel builds etc > > Why?
I'm just guessing here, but I would bet that it'll be similar to the gcc 2.95 / gcc 3.X upgrade. The kernel documentation said to use 2.95 (and still does, in fact), so that's what we did, until it started causing problems with the NPTL tests.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
