On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 7:55:29 AM UTC-5 Thomas wrote: I got some more clarity about this, and I commented the following on the proposed PR:
I can now see that the concept of operation is simple. Within an outline, for a parent-and-subtree: - Ask for a move, get a move; gnxs do not change; - Cut-paste is the same as a move; - Ask for a copy, get a copy, meaning all nodes get new gnxs. - To paste a copy when the top of the copied tree already exists means *by definition* to ask for a copy. I think that Leo's defaults should act this way. I'm not going to do this. See the comments in the PR. I've closed this PR and am not likely to reopen it. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/ac1a1dd9-7d81-4972-abb4-e4355e4502d8n%40googlegroups.com.
