On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 2:46 AM jkn <[email protected]> wrote:

I think that on the one hand putting out more publicity for Leo, eg. via
> the Wikipedia page, and on the other suggesting that such possible
> violation of copyright is 'not worth worrying about', is ... misguided.


Alright. I've just delegated you to investigate. The only acceptable
solution is low-cost, unlimited, permanent, rights to the image.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS0ZiNxvVOBvWVkPHtQiyFAF_CbMTPxG_EujCMjGj2bT_A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to