Haha, I *do *see that it is a demo. And as such I'm not as much "using" it as evaluating it.
I've determined that at the moment that urwid is the really the only mature terminal GUI framework worth investing in. In about 6-8 months it seems likely that prompt-tool-kit will be fully refactored to make full screen GUIs possible but until that point I see urwid as the main option. There is a tiny urwid based code editor called exofrills (xo for short) <https://github.com/scopatz/xo>. I think I would base a Leo console GUI plugin around this. He has got the performance worked out. After that urwid has a tree widget for Leo's tree and Leo's log would be no problem. I think it would not be a stretch to create a useable barebones console GUI using this group of widgets. The downside is that exofrills is python3 only and urwid does not work on Windows. Arguably Windows users won't care about a GUI plugin so I'm not so concerned about that. In any case, I'd like to *try* to make some moves on this but I expect it will be slow going at best. On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 4:16:30 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:21 AM, john lunzer <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Okay, I got it running by loading a single Leo file. >> > > ​Good. Feel free to make other changes. I suspect you are the only one > using the curses plugin. > > As you can see, this plugin is a demo. True curses support would be a > great addition. > > EKR > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
