Richard Fontana wrote: > So I'm guessing you must be talking about what license > files are bundled with the binary package and installed in > /usr/share/licenses ? Being selective about what license files get > installed is already standard though problematically documented Fedora > packaging practice, so this seems okay assuming you're sufficiently > careful about what you decide to "remove" (I'm confused though about > what you mean by "remove" because if my understanding is correct you > are not removing anything, rather you are choosing not to *add* > certain license files).
Yes, I mean that. During installation, Rawtherapee puts all those license files in /usr/share/licenses, but I think really few of them are actually needed and I'm going to just remove them from the buildroot (I do not want to modify sources). For example, Rawtherapee upstream defaults to use the bundled libRaw, but we use the Fedora package, so I think libRaw license file should not end in the RPM package. Right? I totally don't understand why they (upstream) put license files of libraries that aren't even bundled in any way... my understanding is that's not right. Or is there a possible reason from a legal point to distribute those licenses also in the final RPM? Mattia -- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
