I posted this as a comment in one of the old license review issues here 
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/512#note_2075509038,
 but it doesn't seem to have been noticed.

Basically, in the license data there is a file for "LicenseRef-CRC32" here 
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/blob/main/data/LicenseRef-CRC32.toml?ref_type=heads,
 listing it as allowed and with the expression for the license line as 
"LicenseRef-CRC32". However, then there was a review request for that same 
license in https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/512 
which ended up saying that the license identifier should be 
"LicenseRef-Fedora-UltraPermissive", and doesn't seem to mention the existing 
"LicenseRef-CRC32" in the license data.

So, my question is, which is the proper expression to use for this license 
given that it seems there are now two expressions for it?
-- 
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to