Dne 01. 08. 24 v 12:28 odp. Peter Lemenkov napsal(a):
Hello!
I stumbled upon the following situation. I am packaging a library
under MIT license. However the upstream-provided build-script in a
tarball explicitly licensed under ISC license (has a header with ISC
license). If it matters I do not use this script for building at all.
So I have two questions.

1. If a tarball has a differently licensed file which is not going to
a final RPM should I still list its license in a spec's %license
field?
2. Does it change anything if this file wasn't used at all during RPM
build process?

See

  https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-legal-docs/-/issues/61

> Does not affect the License tag. But the license of the file must be from the 
allowed list.

--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys

--
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to