On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:12 PM Richard Fontana <rfont...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 6:55 PM Christian Krause <c...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > >
> > COPYING.GLAD contains: > > - an MIT license (although "Software" is substituted with "materials") > > - an Apache 2.0 license > > - another MIT license > > -> SPDX: MIT AND Apache-2.0 > > The Khronos license uses "the Materials" instead of "the Software". > There was a recent issue in github.com/spdx/license-list-XML about > this, I forget where SPDX ended up on this (whether to revise `MIT` or > to create a new identifier), check the SPDX issues or wait for Jilayne > to chime in. :) There is already this open issue: https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/238 although that is about a different version of the license with an additional admonition paragraph. The SPDX issue is: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2017 I'm not clear on whether the SPDX issue is considering the non-admonition variant. Richard -- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to legal-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
