Dne 14. 02. 23 v 8:34 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 14. 02. 23 v 3:10 Maxwell G napsal(a):This seems like a misuse of distgit to me.I have different view. It tracks that something changed. The syntax (MIT string) stay the same, but semantics changed (Callaway->SPDX).
If it is that important, then it should go into changelog as well. But it does not seem you are also suggesting changelog entry without any other .spec file modification. There could even be different methods to distinguish between SPDX / Callaway identifiers, but non has been selected. Judging by this, it does not deserve git log entry IMHO.
Vít
I don't want to push random empty commits unless they're needed to rebuild the package. Perhaps we can come up with a better way to handle this?Any specific idea? Miroslav _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelinesList Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
