On 04/20/2011 11:33 AM, Scott Dowdle wrote: > I'm guessing that that last word there was a typo... or perhaps it was a > Freudian slip? :)
Yeah, that's a typo. :) > Regarding the Microsoft logo, hey Red Hat and Microsoft do have a low-key > press release-ish agreement to support each others OSes within their own > virtualization platforms... so you'd think Microsoft wouldn't mind if their > logo was used by a project that Red Hat sponsors and uses for an upstream... > when that logo is going to be used in one of the key components of said > virtualization products... so I'm keeping my fingers crossed that Richard can > wrangle through the Red(mond) tape and get approval somehow. I wouldn't assume that a mutual press-release means anything besides the fact that we put out a mutual press-release. :) > Oracle's VirtualBox OSE has OS logos and they are distributing that both > under a free license and without cost so unless they are footing some sort of > licensing fee for those logos, which I strongly doubt, with enough effort > this should be doable. It is almost never the case that because $FOO is doing $BAR, we can also do $BAR. I know that logic is counter-intuitive from a geek perspective (and possibly also from a human one), but in legal matters, you cannot usually rely on the behaviour of other, unconnected parties. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
