On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Tom Callaway <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 02:58 PM, Steve Traylen wrote: > > The new license claims torque is licensed both by the OpenPBS license > > and this new Torque license. > > The torque license v1.0 seems in isolation probably acceptable and > includes > > the acknowledgement from the old license. > > Well, no. The v1.0 license is clearly non-free. > > Thank's I copy pasted the wrong file but you are step ahead of me. The torque-3.0.0-snap.201102011355.tar.gz contains the v1.1 file and I'll move devel to that now. I'll untag the bad build so that it eventually disappears. Steve. > However: As posted here: > > http://www.clusterresources.com/pipermail/torquedev/2011-January/003369.html > > There is a Torque v1.1 license attached to that post, which is Free but > GPL incompatible (due to advertising clause). > > I've added it to the licensing list with "TORQUEv1.1" as its short name > (to cleanly differentiate it from the non-free 1.0 license). Use: > > License: OpenPBS and TORQUEv1.1 > > ~tom > > == > Fedora Project > -- Steve Traylen
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
