Rich
I've tried to move on now the cash cow that is Gary Kelly being consigned to
the scrap heap. You need to do the same pal.
Derry's agent has admitted that Derry visited the Palace hotel on Friday
night but insists that he did not leak the team. So like most of us guessed
he seems involved albeit innocently.
The club's current stance reminds me of the plod's fallback position when
they can't catch a crook ie we havent a cat in hells chance of catching you
so you better just give yourself up. Very impressive eh.
From what little I heard on Tuesday Harvey implied it could have been
handled better but I dont think Dennis has the character to admit he is in
the wrong. Look at the mess he got himself in having to buy Kandol.
He has made a mountain out of a molehill (excuse the pun) and created a
distraction which we just dont need at the moment. If we get anything at
Cardiff I'll shut my trap about this.
Regards
Phill
From: Richard Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Phill Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LU] Chants for QPR match?
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:34:55 +0000 (GMT)
Phill,
If you'd have listened on to the forum you would have
gone mental as we everyone agreeing (including Gray
and Lorimer) that Kelly is our best player and should
be in the team if not injured.
Anyway, I agree with some of your mail about this mole
thing. What a cock up. It seems my scenario of an
innocent conversation between Derry and his best man
regarding Thompson being injured seems to be the best
explanation of the events following Taylor's comments
today. So what will happen now ? Hopefully Denis will
be man enough to admit he jumped the gun and find out
the truth and let's move on to Cardiff.
--- Phill Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cant see anything funny about this - talk about
> piss ups and breweries.
>
> I listened to a bit of the BBC forum last night. I
> turned it off when Harvey
> admitted that the club dont even know who the Mole
> is. Peter Taylor is
> quoted today as saying that Wise has over reacted
> and all that happened was
> an innocent conversation on Friday night between a
> Leeds and a Palace
> player. He has said that some Leeds players played
> that he was not expecting
> and that he did not know the formation.
>
> This has been handled poorly. Wise implied that a
> Leeds player had handed
> the team sheet to Palace and that he said "other
> things". Clearly this needs
> sorting but there is no way it should have been made
> public unless they know
> 100% who the mole is. This has started a witch hunt
> which cannot be any good
> for the team' spirits. It smacks of the Gregan thing
> last season when he was
> allegedly confronted in the car park at ER. Its
> simply a pathetic attempt to
> take pressue of poor little Dennis because his job
> is very difficult. F*ck
> me he knew that before he took the job on. If you
> look at it logically you
> shouldnt give a f*ck if the opposiotion know your
> side - just go out and do
> the business.
>
> I have tried to give this little Cockernry Blurt the
> benefit of the doubt
> but he worries me. He signs up players lilke Foxe,
> Heath and Kandol to be
> followed by John Hartson? Yeah a big, fat, unfit lug
> is just the answer.
> Doesnt he think we maight need a bit more steel in
> the middle of our
> defence? We'll see what team spirit is like at
> Cardiff because I predict nil
> points for us and it gives me no pleasure sayiong
> that.
>
> Soz for the rant Dunders - I can't laugh for crying.
>
> Phill
>
> We are Leeds
>
>
>
> >From: "Dunderhead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[email protected]>
> >Subject: [LU] Chants for QPR match?
> >Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:03:01 -0000
> >
> >All we are saying is give us the mole
> >
> >He's here, he's there, he's every f***ing where, mr
> mole
> >
> >
> >Half time record selection:
> >
> >"Listen, do you want to know a secret?"
> >"What's going on?"
> >
> >And of course, the O'Jays classic: "Backstabbers"
> >
> >Dunderhead
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and
> the list administrators
> >accept no liability for the personal views and
> opinions of contributors.
> >Leedslist mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >...un homme sans culture rassemble un zebre sans
> rayures...
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> MSN Hotmail is evolving check out the new Windows
> Live Mail
> http://ideas.live.com
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and
> the list administrators accept no liability for the
> personal views and opinions of contributors.
> Leedslist mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> ...un homme sans culture rassemble un zebre sans
rayures...
___________________________________________________________
Web email has come of age. Don't settle for less than the All New Yahoo!
Mail http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Hotmail is evolving check out the new Windows Live Mail
http://ideas.live.com
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
the mole has returned
