----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sean Emmott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 6:37 PM Subject: Re: [LU] Is it dead?
> Sean, we can only assume that he was trying to sign > someone as cover for Crainey. eh? > Let's think about this one for a minute. If he really > had decided that Crainey wasn't up to the job (you'd > really hope that this was the case but I doubt it) > then if he'd tried and failed to sign players surely > he just wouldn't give up and think , ah well, I'll > make do with a left back who isn't up to it. Of course > he wouldn't. He would have tried and tried to get a > loan signing in OR try other ideas e.g. Killa to left > back, You slated him for playing our best CB at LB in the play off final. You can't have it both ways Rich. > Richardson to left back , Assuming he was fit you're playing a RB at LB. OK, but then don't complain about KB playing Healy right midfield when we don't have a right midfielder fit. > Lewis to left back - Oh, FFS! Why not play Blake there? Or Ricketts? > anything to plug the defensive frailities of Crainey - > but he didn't so we can only assume that he didn't see > Crainey as a weakness. There are lots of other assumptions we can make. The most likely is that no other suitable LBs were available for signing or loan: or, more likely, we stopped looking and negotiating when Bernard agreed to sign, and were then fucked when he pulled out. Blackwell had to go, but not because he got Crainey confused with Roberto Carlos. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist oh alright then :-)
