|
In a message dated 5/23/2006 12:05:39 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
that the people who play hell about our crap players (Kelly, Gregan, Butler, Well, first I'd point out that there's a difference between saying that the
we should have gone up automatically "with the players we had" and saying we
should have gone up automatically with the money we've spent. Personally, I
think both apply, but bear in mind that we currently have SEVEN forwards in the
first team squad: Hulse, Cresswell, Healy, Blake, Moore, Beckford and Ricketts,
yet when our ONE right winger got injured, Blackwell complained that it
screwed up his whole plan for how we would play this season. Maybe it would have
been better to have four or five forwards, and two right wingers. Just a
thought. (And yes, I know Beckford came on board late in the season, but there's
still no reason to have six strikers on the books and only one right winger,
especially when three of the strikers are classic "big men" who would profit
from a steady supply of crosses from each wing.)
Secondly, if "half our team is shite" then that reflects on
Blackwell. It's his team. With very few exceptions, he signed them and
selected them.
Good players? Good enough to build a promotion-winning team around (as
opposed to good enough for the Premiership)? I'd say Sullivan and Bennett are
good enough. So are Kelly, Richardson, Kilgallon, Lewis, Derry, Miller, Bakke,
Hulse, Healy, Cresswell, Blake and Stone. I haven't seen enough of Beckford
to know about him. Most teams who get promoted from the Championship don't have
top quality players in every position. But they have enough that they can carry
a few journeymen.
Cheers!
Sean
|
- RE: [LU] It seems to me.......... Mark Humphries
- Re: [LU] It seems to me.......... SeanScribe
- Re: [LU] It seems to me.......... Sean Emmott
- RE: [LU] It seems to me.......... Mark Humphries
- Re: [LU] It seems to me.......... SeanScribe
- Re: [LU] It seems to me.......... Sean Emmott

