I would always hold one sub back for injuries, etc. Deploy last sub as a
time wasting measure if you're winning, otherwise, for the last 5-10 mins if
you're after a win, or as on Saturday, for the knackered central midfielder
with 20 mins to go. Overplaying an unfit Bakke won't get him fit, it's more
likely to put him at risk of a strain. You just backed me up with your
comments about Stone. Bakke and Stone are both just back from injury (yes, I
realise Stone's is longer term) and need easing back in gently. I'd rather
Bakke played for the stiffs midweek, than play too long in one session.
Don't see why that's so controversial.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Leslie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] Crewe
I am hoping I've got the wrong end of an ironic posting! but WTF? Subs had
previously been used for injuries and, considering we're safely IN the
play offs and now want to have everyone match fit and well prepared, what
better way of giving everyone possible a good run out than against a team
already relegated in a match that almost effectively means nothing! So
long as we finish 3rd or 4th we get a home leg first, which the backroom
team possibly prefer I don't know (My preference is to go away and counter
attack either sneaking a win or frustrating the hell out of them, sneaking
a win would mean they have to at least have a go at) Bakke may have looked
knackered but isn't that what making him play 90 in THIS game as opposed
to a vital MUST win one is all about? I bet (No money mind !-)) Stone
starts against Preston for pretty much the same reason. Test his fitness
to the limit although in that case he probably will be subbed to make sure
he doesn't overdo it and injure himself again.
Exactly. Why bring on your last sub with 25 minnutes of the match
remaining.
A bad decision by Blackwell.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Humphries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'J Moran'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Phill Shields'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: [LU] Crewe
But presumably Bakke looked ok on 65mins when our last sub was used
(Blake
on for Lewis)?
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:leedslist-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J Moran
Sent: 24 April 2006 14:26
To: Phill Shields; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [LU] Crewe
Total blame on Blackwell for that one. Bakke tried his nuts off firt
half
but is clearly lacking match fitness.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phill Shields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Surprised no mention of Bakke doing an impression of a dog tied to a
12
> foot chain on centre circle for last 20 minutes of the game.
>
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list
administrators
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of
contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
