On 07/05/18 11:31, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 7 May 2018 at 10:46, Felix Fietkau <n...@nbd.name> wrote:
On 2018-05-07 09:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl>
Some maintainers prefer DTS files licensed under permissive license like
MIT / BSD. As all DT bindings should be OS independent and DTS files are
pretty separated from Linux code it probably makes sense to share them
across projects.
The safest solution is to use dual licensing: that way it stays clear
these files can be used in GPL projects without depending on current
belief of licenses compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl>
Some of these files are based on upstream GPL code, did you contact the
original authors already?
I wasn't aware of that. I assumed they are all John's work based on
our quick IRC conversation:
[09:08] <rmilecki> blogic: are you author for
target/linux/ath79/dts/*.dts files?
[09:08] <rmilecki> *of
[09:14] <blogic> rmilecki: yes
[09:14] <blogic> rmilecki: feel free to change the license text and push a fix
ah sorry i forgot about that, let me fix it ...
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
