> On 18 Dec 2017, at 10:12, Felix Fietkau <n...@nbd.name> wrote: > > On 2017-12-18 11:07, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: >> Hi Felix, >> >> Thanks for explaining that. I suspect you’re right that there’s an >> underlying bug in gcc mips. So ideally we need some code that exposes the >> bug when using -O2 (or even just -funroll_loops) Looking at FS 814 there’s a >> hint in there that uhttpd was similarly affected…and not solved by the patch >> drop. So what to do if there’s a bug just lurking to bite us? > > If possible, reproduce it on uhttpd with an unmodified upstream version > of GCC and open up a bug report. > > - Felix
Sadly I’m unable to reproduce the uhttpd issue - frustrating. Cheers, Kevin D-B GPG fingerprint: 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
