+1 from me. I am creating namespaces with a script and would like to see this feature in UCI.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:33 PM Joel Wirāmu Pauling <j...@aenertia.net> wrote: > > Hi there; > > As a long time Openwrt -nee Lede user and sometimes bug reporter; I've been > maintaining my own forks and builds for several different purposes for 10+ > years now. I've gotten a lot out of the project personally and > professionally and would just like to thank everyone for their > contributions. > > When ip net namespaces were first introduced they were a sometimes solution > to a sometimes problem, manually coaxed into life on an adhoc basis. > However in the last 3 years I have increasingly come to the conclusion that > they are now the workhorse of linux routing for the most part. > > As I increasingly move to VNF (virtualised network functions) deploying > Lede images to openstack or similar to provide complex routing > functionality, it's become apparent the lack of standardized namespace > schema inside luci and uci to be exposed and used by default has made lede > a bit of a burden to handle from a support perspective. > > I would like to open a discussion with the wider community and main dev's > about potentially moving towards standardized and across the board use of > namespaces for most-part of core lede functionality. > > So before I start rattling off the use cases I want to know if there are > any Yay or Nay sayers to moving things to namespaces and off the default > routing table? > > > Kind regards > > -Joel > @aenertia on the tweeters > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
