On 07-10-17 14:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > What is your opinion on this topic? Am I missing some arguments? > Currently I would prefer solution 3 going with kernel 4.9 and 4.14. I actually preferred to have a 2nd major release in 2017, using only kernel 4.9, and then a 3rd major release early 2018 using only kernel 4.14. Unfortunately we seem to lack the manpower to get this done, so I am fine with exploring option 3. My only concern with this, is that it will increase the workload for service releases.
Either way, as I said on IRC, I think we should give option 3 a try for our next major release, and revert back to supporting a single kernel version per release if that proves to be too difficult to maintain. For > 4.9, please have a look at https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/stintel/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kernel This was in perfect shape, but I messed up when reworking after the split of patches directory to {backport,hack,pending}. Nonetheless it should be easier to start from there than to redo everything from scratch. Stijn _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
