In commit b11c51916cb9 ("ramips: Improve Sanlinking D240 config") I made
a mistake with regards GPIO numbering. And in addition to specifying the
wrong GPIO for controling the power of one of the mini-PCIe, I recently
discovered that the power of both slots can be controlled.
This patch specifies the correct GPIO for the left-most mini-PCIe slot
of the D240 (labeled power_mpcie2 since the slot is attached to SIM2),
and adds a GPIO that can be used to control the power of the other
mini-PCIe slot (labeled power_mpcie1).
Signed-off-by: Kristian Evensen <kristian.even...@gmail.com>
---
target/linux/ramips/dts/D240.dts | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/D240.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/D240.dts
index 4f3da8d316..7ae2daa0b1 100644
--- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/D240.dts
+++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/D240.dts
@@ -53,8 +53,15 @@
power_mpcie2 {
gpio-export,name = "power_mpcie2";
gpio-export,output = <GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
- gpios = <&gpio0 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ gpios = <&gpio2 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
};
+
+ power_mpcie1 {
+ gpio-export,name = "power_mpcie1";
+ gpio-export,output = <GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ gpios = <&gpio2 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ };
+
};
gpio-leds {
@@ -94,6 +101,10 @@
status = "okay";
};
+&gpio2 {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
&gpio3 {
status = "okay";
};
@@ -157,7 +168,7 @@
&pinctrl {
state_default: pinctrl0 {
default {
- ralink,group = "i2c", "uartf", "wled", "spi refclk",
"pa";
+ ralink,group = "i2c", "uartf", "wled", "spi refclk",
"pa", "nd_sd";
ralink,function = "gpio";
};
};
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
