Hi, As many already acknowledged this proposal I would like to call for an official vote among the LEDE committers till 14.6.2017 on this proposal. I counted the following replays to the proposal already as an acknowledgment: Steven, Matthias, Stijn, Hauke, Florian, Daniel, Hans, John, Rafał, Felix, Alexander, Piotr If you till ack it, you do not have to do it again.
I haven't seen any NACK among the LEDE committers till now. If this will get accepted by the LEDE committers and also the OpenWrt core developers accept it, I would like the OpenWrt core developers start with migrating the openwrt.org domain to the SPI as a first step. Hauke On 05/29/2017 09:03 AM, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber > that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal > with many details will delay the remerge even more. > > Ideally we manage to vote during this week. > > > John > > *) rules > - owrt will adopt the lede rules and voting system > > *) branding > - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand > - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most > people said they did not care > - as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a remerge using the owrt brand is > the only feasible option > > *) domain > - transfer owner ship to SPI for openwrt.org and lede-project.org > - add them to the pool of urls at digital ocean > - post remerge build a setup where we have several DNS servers in > various locations > - point git.openwrt.org at the lede git server > - point bugs.openwrt.org to the lede flyspray instance > - keep both wikis and forums as is (we should decide post remerge how to > proceed to avoid these issues blocking the progress) > - update the lede domain entries for build/download/rsync/... servers so > that the openwrt domain also points at them > > *) SPI > - nominate a new liaison team (imre and john offer to do this, if anyone > else is interested let us know) > - inform SPI of the new liaisons, voters and project rules > - this should be done early in the remerge process s.t. the domains can > be handed over > > *) github > - start pushing to the openwrt organisation > - cleanup the list of owners in the openwrt organisation > - obsolete all issues on the openwrt organisation and close the issue > tracker > - go through the open openwrt and lede PRs, pickup whats useful and > close the rest, asking people to repost (things wont be rebasable anyhow) > - close the lede PR tracker > - obsolete the lede github org after a grace period of 3-6 months > > *) landing page > - add a letter of intent / notice to both current landing pages > announcing the remerge > - update the lede landing page to represent the openwrt name > - update the landing page to have the same look & feel as the current > openwrt landing page > - point openwrt.org at the lede landing page > - try to find some design guru that will transform the owrt theme to one > appropriate to this century > > *) trac > - trac is already readonly, keep content so that search engines can > still find the it > - edit the trac html templates, adding a note pointing at the > bug.openwrt.org instance > > *) IRC > - add back cloaking > - give people channel ownership/admin rights > > *) email accounts > - currently there are around ~20 active openwrt.org mail accounts (the 3 > owrt devs would like to keep theirs active) > - turn all the webmaster@, hostmaster@, ... accounts into aliases that > anyone with voting rights can be subscribed to > - ask those people that are no longer active to voluntarily give up > their accounts > - mail addresses may under no conditions be used for any personal > business, consultancy, applying for jobs, ... purposes > - any mail sent from an openwrt.org account needs to adhere the > trademark policy and should only be used for FOSS purposes > > *) wiki / forum > - TBD > - asking in either forum/wiki will get a biased vote so keep them both > around > - start a separate discussion regarding these post remerge > > *) LF > - find out what doubts folks have about LF > - find out benefits - we would have their hosting and sponsorship ?! > - start a separate discussion regarding these post remerge > > *) git trees > - rebrand the lede tree to openwrt > - work out what has happened inside the openwrt tree since the reboot > and pick up the useful bits (zoltan has done some prior work on this > already) > > *) mailing list > - ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists > - send out invitation mails to the new list > - setup redirect/auto-reply for the existing lists > > *) trademark policy > - review/ack imres trademark policy (https://openwrt.org/trademark) > > *) timeline > - vote / agree on the proposal within the next week > - work on the action items in the 4 weeks after that > > John > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-de...@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > lede-adm mailing list > lede-...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-adm _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
