On 05/31/2017 02:09 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > On 05/31/2017 11:02 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> Add a CMake FIND_PATH and INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES searching for >> libubox/uloop.h. Some external toolchains which do not include standard >> locations would fail to find the header otherwise. >> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> >> --- >> upgraded/CMakeLists.txt | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/upgraded/CMakeLists.txt b/upgraded/CMakeLists.txt >> index 00d8ce575c25..fd7d6bb58b78 100644 >> --- a/upgraded/CMakeLists.txt >> +++ b/upgraded/CMakeLists.txt >> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ >> cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6) >> >> PROJECT(upgraded C) >> +FIND_PATH(ubox_include_dir libubox/uloop.h) >> +INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES(${ubox_include_dir}) >> ADD_DEFINITIONS(-Os -ggdb -Wall -Werror --std=gnu99 -Wmissing-declarations) >> ADD_EXECUTABLE(upgraded upgraded.c ../watchdog.c) >> TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(upgraded ubox) > > Another option would be to use the CMake module I wrote for my GSoC project > last year: > > https://gitlab.com/neoraider/ece/blob/master/cmake/Findubox.cmake > > With this, find_package(ubox REQUIRED) can be used to get the > include/library definitions, while still allowing to override the values on > the cmake cmdline or using ccmake, in case CMake can't find the right paths > automatically. > > The repo also contains reusable CMake modules for ubus and libjson-c.
I have to admit that I am not familiar enough with CMake modules to make up something useful yet, why don't we apply my patch and we look into incorporating your module in OpenWrt/LEDE's CMake infrastructure next? Thanks! -- Florian _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev